Trust Council Late Item Package
· Islands Trust Area · Meeting Documents · 2021
Original Trust document
· 4,449 KB
· SHA-256 15f35f5c2a329422…
33,727 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Topics: Marine & foreshore · Housing & affordability · First Nations & reconciliation · Transportation & ferries · Governance & budget · Climate & environment — our classification, not the Trust's.
Extracted text (beginning)
Table of Contents J. Eastick re: for Trust Council's consideration E. FitzZaland re: Policy Statement Discussion S. Palmer re: Policy Statement, Housing and Communities D. Goldman re: Policy Statement, Housing and Communities A. Hodson re: Driftwood News Survey A. Olsen MLA re: Broadband services B. McConchie re: Oceans Protection Plan Dialogue Forum 2021 - Anchorages Minister Fleming re: Election and Appointment D. Bouvier re: Live and Let Live R. Holmes re: Policy Statement G. Brazier re: TC Agenda M. Auerbach re: Policy Statement Project E. O'Brien re: Denman feeback on inclusion S. Frei re: IT Policy Statement 2 4 13 21 17 7 22 5 6 19 20 10 23 24 Dear Trustees, I was literally blown-away when someone posted the URL for this Islands Trust Report, dated February 2020 called “The State of the Islands Indicators Project Final Report ” on Facebook. http://www.islandstrust.bc.ca/media/349032/tas_2020-02_stateoftheislands_finalreport-with- survey_final.pdf I quote from the report: “Informed discussions about how we can all preserve and protect the Islands Trust Area depend on being firmly grounded in the realities that surround us. All too often, in the absence of insightful indicators, we form opinions and beliefs based on anecdotal experiences or feelings about how things are. This report includes a selection of socio-economic and environmental indicators that illustrate what is happening on our islands and in our communities.” This graph was particularly concerning to me: It shows that 2 Islands are near and one other is already in the ‘zone of harm’ to their ecosystems. What is troubling me even more is that this report does not represent the reality. The reality being that every Island has existing unrealised development potential that are not factored-in in the report. For example, Gabriola Island, which is already the second most densified per square kilometer Island in the Trust Area after Bowen Island (Census Canada) may see the doubling of its population without creating a single new density. I wonder how the graph would look like if a computer-modelling was generated to show where the Islands would be in this graph if their ‘development potential was factored-in. When did Staff produce your last Development Potential (aka Built-Out) Map? Do you know? On Gabriola such a map was last produced in 2010. An up-to-date Map will apparently be released soon but, ironically, after the conclusion of a community-wide consultation on Housing Options....and also after a Bylaw Process that would create a bonus density land-use designation for housing, now at Ministerial Approval stage. At least Gambier, Lasqueti, Thetis, Saturna, Galiano and even Bowen Islands do not need to need worry yet unless of course, their ‘hidden’ potential is through-the-roof. How/when did your Island respond to a government directive to insert affordable housing policies in their OCP in the mid-90s? In 1996, Gabriola adopted a new OCP and c
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.