Letter Minister LeBlanc MP
· Islands Trust Area · News & Advocacy · 2018
Original Trust document
· 321 KB
· SHA-256 83c87feff64a6f9e…
6,651 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Topics: Marine & foreshore · Aquaculture & shellfish · First Nations & reconciliation · Governance & budget · Climate & environment — our classification, not the Trust's.
Extracted text (beginning)
200 - 1627 Fort St., Victoria, BC V8R 1H8 Telephone (250) 405-5151 Fax (250) 405-5155 Toll Free via Enquiry BC in Vancouver 604.660.2421. Elsewhere in BC 1.800.663.7867 Email information@islandstrust.bc.ca Web www.islandstrust.bc.ca Bowen Denman Hornby Gabriola Galiano Gambier Lasqueti Mayne North Pender Salt Spring Saturna South Pender Thetis January 2, 2018 via e-mail: min@dfo-mpo.gc.ca File Number: 5450-30 The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, MP Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada 200 Kent Street, Station 15N100 Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 Dear Minister LeBlanc: Re: Request for ecosystem-based study of potential impacts of the Integrated Geoduck Management Framework 2017 on the health of the Salish Sea On behalf of the Islands Trust Council I am writing to request that Fisheries and Oceans Canada undertake, as a priority, an ecosystem-based study of potential and cumulative impacts of the Integrated Geoduck Management Framework 2017 on the health of the Salish Sea. There are concerns in our island communities that DFO did not sufficiently consider ecosystem and cumulative impacts before approving the 2017 Integrated Geoduck Management Framework. It is my understanding that when creating the Framework, DFO chose to focus analysis of geoduck aquaculture impacts to “conservation and long-term sustainability of wild geoduck stocks” rather than impacts to the broader environment. No mention is made in the Framework of protection of the marine environment, fish habitat, biodiversity or human health. DFO staff advises that broader ecological impacts will be assessed at the licence application level. This raises concern for us and community members that assessment at the individual licence level will result in insufficient consideration of cumulative impacts regionally, and at the ecosystem level. Concerns about the adequacy of the science that informs geoduck aquaculture regulations are not new. In 2007, the BC Legislature’s Special Committee on Sustainable Aquaculture recommended that: “No new species are to be approved for commercial aquaculture without a consensus of independent peer-reviewed science demonstrating that the potential impact on the marine environment is minimal”. (7.5) Islands Trust staff has reviewed the available research and did not get an impression that there is yet scientific consensus about the potential impacts of intensive geoduck aquaculture in the Salish Sea. Staff noted that many articles conclude with calls for additional research. It seems prudent for DFO to study and understand the potential and cumulative impacts of future geoduck clam aquaculture installations. The Framework states that the objective of supporting economically, environmentally and socially sustainable wild and aquaculture fisheries will support the integrated management of wild and aquaculture fisheries for geoduck. With this in mind, we respectfully suggest th
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.