Galiano LTC Regular Meeting Minutes
· Galiano Island · Meeting Documents · 2013
Original Trust document
· 75 KB
· SHA-256 66c9c292c6781030…
7,911 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Extracted text (beginning)
GLLTC-CIM – dated April 8/2013 Page 1 of 4
NOTES OF THE GALIANO ISLAND
LOCAL TRUST COMMITTEE
COMMUNITY INFORMATION MEETING
HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2013 AT 12:40 PM
AT THE SOUTH ISLAND COMMUNITY HALL,
GALIANO ISLAND, B.C.
PRESENT: Ken Hancock Chair
Louise Decario Local Trustee
Sandy Pottle Local Trustee
Kris Nichols Island Planner
David Millership Recording Secretary
There were approximately nineteen (19) members of the public present.
Chair Hancock called the meeting to order at 12:40 p.m. Introductions were made
and the meeting introduced.
Chair Hancock stated that a Community Information Meeting (CIM) gives the public
an opportunity to ask questions.
3.1 Covenant ET016476 – Amendment
Planner Nichols provided information and stated that in general terms,
the purpose of the original covenant is to place additional use
conditions on a portion of a lot at 8395 Porlier Pass Road. He stated
that the covenant was registered on the parent parcel (District Lot (DL)
48) to regulate the industrial use of a portion of DL 48 that is now Lot
1, VIP83820 and zoned Forest Industrial (FI). He stated that when the
larger lot (Remnant (Rem) DL 48) was subsequently subdivided from
the smaller lot (Lot 1) the covenant remained on both parcels. Planner
Nichols stated that the remnant parcel is zoned Forest 1 and
Agriculture and therefore the covenant does not pertain to any
permitted uses for the lot and can be removed. He stated that the
covenant will remain on the smaller FI lot to which it is relevant but be
amended. He stated that the proposed amendments would be to
remove the decibel measurement requirement (paragraph 1), to add a
screening requirement and to amend paragraphs 1, 2 and 3.
Chair Hancock invited the Trustees to ask questions.
Chair Hancock invited the public to make comment.
Bill Russell (418 Montague Road) stated support for the proposed
amendments but questioned why a screening amendment was even
necessary.
C
C
o
o
m
m
m
m
u
u
n
n
i
i
t
t
y
y
I
I
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
m
m
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
M
M
e
e
e
e
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
R
R
e
e
c
c
e
e
i
i
v
v
e
e
d
d
F
F
o
o
r
r
I
I
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
m
m
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
B
B
y
y
L
L
o
o
c
c
a
a
l
l
T
T
r
r
u
u
s
s
t
t
C
C
o
o
m
m
m
m
i
i
t
t
t
t
e
e
e
e
GLLTC-CIM – dated April 8/2013 Page 2 of 4
Trustee Decario stated that Planner Nichols recommended the
screening amendment for reasons relating to noise abatement.
There was some discussion regarding: noise decibel readings;
professional advice; nuisance noise and the possibility for a related
Local Trust Committee (LTC) bylaw; Capital Region
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.