Gambier LTC Regular Meeting Agenda Addendum
· Gambier Island · Meeting Documents · 2024
Original Trust document
· 802 KB
· SHA-256 69bb15606765ccb2…
9,838 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Topics: Marine & foreshore · Bylaw enforcement · Governance & budget — our classification, not the Trust's.
Extracted text (beginning)
Gambier Island Local Trust Committee Regular Meeting Addendum Time: Location: Pages 16. RESUMED - MAY 14, 2024 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM 16.2 Trustee Bernardo Memorandum dated May 14, 2024 regarding Proposed Bylaw 154 2 - 5 Date: April 29, 2024 continued on May 14, 2024 10:00 am Electronic Meeting Islands Trust Briefing Page 1 To: Gambier Local Trust Committee Marlis McCargar From: Joe Bernardo For: May 14, 2024 Special Meeting Subject: Proposed Bylaw 154 – Outstanding Issues MINOR EDITS FOR CLARITY & CONSISTENCY Per the numbering used in the Staff’s latest draft: Section 9.3.3(b) should read: “New construction and, additions to: upland buildings or structures...” Section 9.3.3(e) should read: “Development design shall should prevent the release of...” Section 9.3.3(f) should read: “...then development and mitigation measures shall should be undertaken under...” Section 9.3.5(f)(iv) should be deleted because: o The first part says “Replacement structures should utilize a non-structural approach...”. This language is self-contradictory and undercuts the purpose of Section 9.3.5(f), which is to provide guidelines for situations in which a need to replace an existing shoreline protection structure with another structure has already been identified. o The second part that says “...should abut the existing shoreline protection structure” assumes an abutting structure exists beside the one to be replaced, which is not necessarily the case. The provision is also redundant, because the point is already covered by Section 9.3.5(d)(iv). DOCK MATERIALS The version of proposed Bylaw 154 that received second reading last term includes a guideline under Section 9.3.3(q) that says: Docks should not use unenclosed plastic foam or other non-biodegradable materials that have the potential to degrade over time. Docks should be constructed of stable materials that will not degrade water quality. The use of creosote-treated pilings is not permitted. The Staff has proposed that this language be replaced (and renumbered as Section 9.3.4(f)) with the following: 2 Islands Trust Briefing Page 2 Docks materials should be constructed from: i. Biodegradable and stable materials that will not degrade water quality; and ii. Creosote-free pilings Adopting this wording would change the meaning of the proposed guideline. The original language did not express an intention that docks should be constructed using biodegradable materials. Rather, it advised that non-biodegradable construction materials should be avoided if they have the potential to harm water quality over time (e.g., exposed Styrofoam). The value of biodegradable materials is that exposure to natural processes breaks them down to natural organic molecules that can safely re-enter the environment. By definition, that makes such materials inherently unstable and unsuitable for the wear and tear that comes from permanent exposure to harsh
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.