Letter Minister Heyman MLA - PRM
· Islands Trust Area · News & Advocacy · 2018
Original Trust document
· 322 KB
· SHA-256 ce0ef170800a63f5…
5,197 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Topics: Bylaw enforcement · Climate & environment · First Nations & reconciliation · Governance & budget — our classification, not the Trust's.
Extracted text (beginning)
200 - 1627 Fort St., Victoria, BC V8R 1H8 Telephone (250) 405-5151 Fax (250) 405-5155 Toll Free via Enquiry BC in Vancouver 604.660.2421. Elsewhere in BC 1.800.663.7867 Email information@islandstrust.bc.ca Web www.islandstrust.bc.ca Bowen Denman Hornby Gabriola Galiano Gambier Lasqueti Mayne North Pender Salt Spring Saturna South Pender Thetis January 19, 2018 via e-mail: CitizenEngagement@gov.bc.ca File Number: 0420-20 The Honourable George Heyman Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Room 112 Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC V8V 1X4 Dear Minister Heyman: Re: Review of Professional Reliance Model I am writing to you in regards to the Province’s decision to conduct a review of the professional reliance model used in the natural resource sector. I understand that under this model government sets the natural resource management objectives or results to be achieved, and professionals hired by proponents decide how those objectives or results will be met. We see that a strength of the current system is that most of the Qualified Environmental Practitioners (QEPs) in the province have membership in professional associations such as the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC or the College of Applied Biology. Membership in good standing within these associations allows for self-governed practice within the discipline. However, we have concern that the regulatory model allows for instances when clients’ interests may be put ahead of sustainability and compliance. We encourage government leadership for new regulations allowing local governments to develop qualified vendors lists and terms of reference for QEPs. This would help local governments ensure that the reports from professionals address the specific needs of the community. We also encourage increased provincial staff capacity and resources for provincial assessment of land use proposals and other environmental matters. Where the professional reliance model is used, we believe there should be more rigorous oversight by ministry staff to ensure that the professionals are following established methodology. For example, ministry staff who are currently dealing with QEP repots under the Riparian Areas Regulation do not have any authority to reject a report that does not follow established methodology. This results in the local government receiving a QEP report that may or may not meet the methodology established in the Riparian Areas Act. We would appreciate it if you would also consider environmental assessment practices as part of the review. In a 2015 letter to the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) about improving public participation in environmental assessment I noted, on behalf of the Islands Trust Council, that to address .../2 The Honourable George Heyman January 19, 2018 Page 2 community concerns members of the public do not have the same abili
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.