Regional Planning Committee Addendum
Original Trust document
· 1,129 KB
· SHA-256 0b9eee8437ae3156…
9,924 characters of machine-extracted text. Extraction is automatic and can be wrong; the original governs.
Topics: Housing & affordability · First Nations & reconciliation · Governance & budget — our classification, not the Trust's.
Extracted text (beginning)
Islands Trust Request For Decision Page 1
REQUEST FOR DECISION
To: Regional Planning Committee For the Meeting of: November 3, 2021
From: David Marlor, Director, Local
Planning Services
Date Prepared: November 1, 2021
SUBJECT:
Review of Trust Council Policy 5.9.1 Best Management Practices For Delivery of Local
Planning Services To Local Trust Committees
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Regional Planning Committee endorse the draft policy “5.9.1 Best Management Practices For
Delivery of Local Planning Services to Local Trust Committees” in principle, and forward to Trust
Council for comment and feedback.
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COMMENTS: n/a
1 PURPOSE: To update the Islands Trust policy on delivery of planning services to local trust
committees to include a recommended process and format for systematic updates to official
community plans and land use bylaws, to provide a framework for allocating planning resources
for local trust committees’ land use planning projects.
2 BACKGROUND: At its regular meeting on August 25, 2021 the Regional Planning Committee
passed the following resolution:
RPC-2021-013
It was MOVED and SECONDED,
that the Regional Planning Committee request that Staff draft amendments to Trust
Council Policy “5.9.1 Best Management Practices for Delivery of Local Planning Services
to Local Trust Committees” to support a strategic approach to official community plan
and land use bylaw reviews that:
include a robust project definition phase
include a recommended process (timeline and activities) for undertaking
review of OCPs and LUBs in three categories
o Major, Minor and Extraordinary;
o define Major as a project that would take about 6-18 months and be
undertaken by the Regional Planning Team, and follow a
recommended process established in the Policy;
o define Minor as a project that would take six months or less and
would be undertaken by the local planning team;
o o define extraordinary as a project that requires more time and
resources than “major”, and would require external consultants
and additional funding considerations;
Late item 6.1 Regional Planning Committee
Nov 3, 2021 meeting
Islands Trust Request For Decision Page 2
include a recommended OCP and LUB format that all new OCPs and
LUBs would use as a starting point, with local customization to deal with
local issues permitted;
include criteria for making recommendations as to which OCPs should
receive priority;
limit the number of reviews started to two per 12 month period and
staggered to accommodate resource requirements;
include guidelines for a community engagement and communication
strategy that considers the IAP2 scale and best practices;
allow for the “Lasqueti community-driven approach”;
standardize the link between the OCP process and LUB process; and
include identification of stakeholders and key partners.
The draft “5.9.1 Best Manageme
First 3,000 characters. Open the original for the whole document.